Skip to content

Go big or go home

My review of Bold by Peter Diamandis and Steven Kotler in the wsj.

Lawrence before Arabia

My review of Anthony Sattin’s fascinating new book The Young T.E. Lawrence in today’s

…and now Prof. Edelman apologizes.

I’m sure this was a totally personal decision.

HBS negotiation professor goes doolally over $4 overcharge on Chinese take-out.

Priceless evidence that obsessing over the details of a negotiation isn’t always the best idea. As I dimly recall, sometimes one should just step up to the balcony, have a good look at one’s BATNA and ZOPA and if possible build a golden bridge to the other side. Don’t just try to carve up the existing pie (or in this case the stir fried chicken with spicy capsicum), Professor Ben Edelman. Find a way to expand it! Don’t make it a zero-sum game. Make it win-win! For you and the Sichuan Garden of Woburn, MA.

Congratulations to Hilary Sargent and for their excellent scoop.

Returning to HBS

Yesterday, I found myself back on the HBS campus for the first time since I graduated to talk to a group of MBA students about writing and publishing. The campus is festooned – Ok, a few lampposts are festooned – with these banners displaying quotes from alumni and faculty  intended to stoke interest in yet another fund-raising campaign. Perhaps I’m getting slow, but it took a couple of reads before I could grasp what they were trying to say. If “You’re only as good as the leaders you have underneath you,” then who are you??? That aside it was great to go back and meet some of the classes of 2015 & 2016. Thank you for the invitation, Gong Ke Gouldstone, and all who showed up.

2014-12-02 14.25.432014-12-02 14.25.57

Reviewing the Moral Case for Fossil Fuels in the WSJ…

12/2/14. To quote one email in response: “Humankind is an evil and amoral animal and has always been so…Humankind doesn’t have any more wisdom, foresight and free will than an ebola virus.” Hmmm.

A piece on European deflation in The Spectator…

…Draghi’s loading the torpedoes, but the real issue is whether the old really want to hand over their wealth to the young.

How a British investor in Sierra Leone is grappling with the Ebola breakout…

my piece on Tom Cairnes and ManoCap

Andrew Carnegie on why entrepreneurs should not own stock….

Andrew Carnegie: wise old bird.

Andrew Carnegie: wise old bird.

Reading Andrew Carnegie’s autobiography this morning, I came upon this passage. He argues that owning shares is a monstrous distraction from the more important ways in which we can earn and accumulate wealth – notably by working. His point could be applied more broadly to the insanity of letting the stock market dictate any analysis of the health of the economy. The stock market has become like some aging Vegas hoofer gyrating ever more preposterously to seize our attention, while deserving ever less.

I have never bought or sold a share of stock speculatively in my life, except one small lot of Pennsylvania Railroad shares that I bought early in life for investment and for which I did not pay at the time because bankers offered to carry it for me at a low rate. I have adhered to the rule never to purchase what I did not pay for, and never to sell what I did not own. In those early days, however, I had several interests that were taken over in the course of business. They included some stocks and securities that were quoted on the New York Stock Exchange, and I found that when I opened my paper in the morning I was tempted to look first at the quotations of the stock market. As I had determined to sell all my interests in every outside concern and concentrate my attention upon our manufacturing concerns in Pittsburgh, I further resolved not even to own any stock that was bought and sold upon any stock exchange. With the exception of trifling amounts which came to me in various ways I have adhered strictly to this rule.

Such a course should commend itself to every man in the manufacturing business and to all professional men. For the manufacturing man especially the rule would seem all-important. His mind must be kept calm and free if he is to decide wisely the problems which are continually coming before him. Nothing tells in the long run like good judgment, and no sound judgment can remain with the man whose mind is disturbed by the mercurial changes of the Stock Exchange. It places him under an influence akin to intoxication. What is not, he sees, and what he sees, is not. He cannot judge of relative values or get the true perspective of things. The molehill seems to him a mountain and the mountain a molehill, and he jumps at conclusions which he should arrive at by reason. His mind is upon the stock quotations and not upon the points that require calm thought. Speculation is a parasite feeding upon values, creating none.

Warren Buffett vs. Elon Musk for the future of car selling

Wrote this for


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 564 other followers